In our library, you will find helpful documents, reports, publications, and discussions provided by attorney Bob Battle.
The documents below are available to the public so that they can gain a better understanding of the legal challenges facing them, and why an experienced attorney is so important for success.
- Page 14
-
Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds ruling requiring Breath Machine Maker to reveal source codeThe Kentucky Court of Appeals has upheld a ruling that the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer 5000 (the same breath machine used in Virginia) must reveal its source code. The source code is basically the computer software program used on the machine.
-
Henrico Circuit Court Opinion Ruling Abuser Fees are ConstitutionalCircuit Court Opinion Ruling Civil Remedial Fees are Constitutional
-
Minnesota Law making purchases property of stateMinnesota Law making purchases property of state at issue in DUI source code case
-
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision Requiring State to Reveal Intoxilyzer 5000 Source CodesMinnesota Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision Requiring State to Reveal Intoxilyzer 5000 Source Codes.
-
Virginia Civil Remedial Fees Ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL by Henrico County General District Court Judge- READ FULL OPINION2007_08_02 Opinion of Henrico County General District Court declaring Civil Remedial Fees for traffic offenses unconstitutional.
-
Copy of Motion filed in Henrico County to declare Civil Remedial Fees UnconstitutionalMotion filed in Henrico General District Court seeking to declare Civil Remedial Fees Unconstitutional.
-
Tort Reform Bonanza: The $54 Million Pants CaseWhen reasonable people get mad, they often do unreasonable things. This is why tort reform groups routinely grab onto and publicize overblown and ridiculous lawsuits like the $54 Million Pants lawsuit. Their hopes are that you'll get mad enough to limit your own access to the courts.
-
Virginia Lawyer's Weekly Ad
-
Medical Malpractice Insurers Claiming Poverty Again
-
Virginia Police Can't Arrest for Driving on SuspendedMoore v. CW- VA Supreme Court holds that Virginia law requires that police issue Summons for Driving on Suspended license and that arrest was improper.
-
Virginia Courts Rule that Police Can't Arrest for Driving on Suspended and Escape from Police not UnlawfulIn Cross v CW- Virginia Court of Appeals cites case stating that police may not arrest for Driving on Suspended and that Motorist who fled from police was resisting an unlawful arrest, which is not unlawful in Virginia.
-
Code of Virginia Searchable site that provides access to Virginia code.Code of Virginia- searchable